June 13, 2010

'R'Oil Indignation

... by Walter Brasch

The British are upset with the United States. That's not too unusual. There was this revolution thing a couple of centuries ago.

But America's Number 1 ally is upset that Americans are blaming BP for that nasty little oil spill in the Gulf. You know, the one where as much as 1.7 million gallons of crude oil a day has given us new species of no-flight pelicans and black-skinned dolphins.

The Brits' FaceBook pages, blogs, radio comments, and letters to newspapers are full of nasty comments about how America is over-reacting, how Americans are unjustly blaming Britain and all that is holy about corporate incompetence. Boris Johnson, the conservative mayor of London, told BBC Radio he worried about "anti-British rhetoric . . . that seems to be permeating from America." Ian Cowie, London Daily Telegram feature columnist, bluntly wrote, "Much of the rhetoric from other American politicians is plainly jingoistic claptrap with a beady eye on their own chances in the U.S. midterm elections." He is partially accurate; many American politicians, more than a few of whom were in the bed of the oil companies throughout their political careers, may be grandstanding. But, there is truly justifiable outrage by all Americans and all politicians.

In response to President Obama's tough accusations and threats to BP, the Daily Telegram headlined its story, "Obama's Boot on the Throat of British Pensioners," a reference to a reality that BP stock dividends provide a huge source of pension revenue. BP expects to pay a $14.7 billion quarterly dividend, about a 9 percent return, or roughly nine times what the average American earns in a savings account. Attorney General Eric Holder is planning to force BP to suspend dividends and is also contemplating criminal charges, something that will interfere with a delightful afternoon tea. A 40 percent decline in BP stock is attributed not so much to the disaster that BP caused but to President Obama's tough stance.

The British also upset that some people, including President Obama, are calling the world's fourth largest corporation, and the largest one in the United Kingdom, British Petroleum, its former name, and not BP, its legal pseudo-anonymous name. So far, no one's calling it the Anglo-Persian Oil Company, its first name—or the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, its second name. And hardly anyone remembers that Dwight Eisenhower, in the first year of his presidency in 1953, authorized a CIA bloody coup to retake the company that had become nationalized by the Iranians after World War II.

That economic value includes sales of about $239 billion last year, including $2.3 billion from the Pentagon, and employment of 80,000 persons, most of whom know how to find, drill, and sell oil, but apparently have no clue of how to stop oil disasters.

The Brits do believe that most—they hardly ever say all—of the disaster is BP's fault. BP did try to save money by not installing adequate oil rig protections, and didn't have a solid disaster plan. But, in fairness, some of the disaster is distinctively America's fault. The Department of the Interior had become too cozy with the oil industry. During the first decade of the 21st century, dozens of Interior and oil company officials traded jobs, as if they were trading baseball cards. The U.S., unlike many nations, especially those in the North Atlantic, also didn't require better disaster plans.

British Prime Minister David Cameron, while saying he was "frustrated" by the oil spill and its effects, also stated that "It is in everyone's interest that BP continues to be a financially strong and stable company." George Osborne, England's Chancellor of the Exchequer, reminds Americans of the "economic value BP brings to the people in Britain and America."

Peel away some of their own rhetoric and anger at America, and you get something familiar to Americans: BP is just too big to fail. You know, too big like those large mega-corporations that the Bush–Cheney administration threw billions of bailout dollars to in order to keep them from failing—and then watched as they failed and took hundreds of thousands Americans with them.

But not getting much benefit are the Gulf Coast's fishing industry and shrimping industries. They're apparently not too big to fail. Perhaps that's because the income of a ship's captain, the deckhands, or just about anyone involved in the industry is only a tiny fraction of the $6 million that the BP CEO made last year.

Also not apparently too big to fail is the environmental campaigns to save the animals and plants of the Gulf coast. Thousands of unpaid volunteers have come to the Coast to help wash and rehabilitate the pelicans and other marine life, to try to help humanity by helping preserve our oceans, beaches, and wildlife.

More than 50 passages in the Bible, both Old and New Testaments, tell us we must be good stewards of the land and all its life.

We aren't doing a very good job.

[Assisting on this story was Rosemary R. Brasch. Dr. Brasch's latest book is a humorous and sarcastic look at American media, Sex and the Single Beer Can, (3rd ed.), available through amazon.com and other companies.]

Posted by Walter Brasch at June 13, 2010 09:51 PM | Guest Writings | Technorati links |

I didn't know that bees peed.

Well, isn't that what BP stands for...bee pee?

Nor was I aware that bees peed crude oil, a huge amount of crude oil, a monstrous amount of crude oil, a tsun...

Oh, forget it.

Posted by: The Oracle at June 14, 2010 08:34 PM

That is sad. I hope the feud will be okay. The problem will not be solved if continued to be like that.

Posted by: Ryan Shaw at June 15, 2010 09:18 AM