March 16, 2010

Relations with Israel

A few things to read regarding the Israeli/US dispute, because there seem to be a lot of hidden forces which drove the incident and the response creating the current rift. The following pieces help put this incident in context and perhaps answer some of the questions about what the heck happened?

Question 1: How likely was this incident just an innocent mistake like Netanyahu said?

As Biden Visits, Israel Unveils Plan for New Settlements

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was clearly embarrassed at the move by his interior minister, Eli Yishai, leader of the right-wing Shas Party, who has made Jewish settlement in East Jerusalem one of his central causes.

A statement issued in the name of the Interior Ministry but distributed by the prime ministerís office said that the housing plan was three years in the making and that its announcement was procedural and unrelated to Mr. Bidenís visit. It added that Mr. Netanyahu had just been informed of it himself.

Question 2: What led to the Israeli government's decision and what caused the Israelis to be so aggressive and bold in their announcement precisely when it would cause the greatest harm?

New Evidence Netanyahu is Consciously Sabotaging Peace Effort

Shortly after Vice President Joe Bidenís arrival in Israel, Netanyahu and Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat were the headliners at Pastor John Hageeís two-hour Christians United for Israel (CUFI) extravaganza at the Jerusalem Convention Center. Ambassador Michael Oren and Deputy Foreign Minister Daniel Ayalon were also in attendance. There was no ambiguity. It was a blatant and unabashed rejection of "dividing the land," filled with repeated references to Jerusalem as the undivided capital of the Jewish people.

So the Christian Zionist, John Hagee, who believes it is foretold that a major war in the Middle East is the sign of the start of the Apocalypse and believes he has been given the role to help create the conditions for this end was in Israel and tossed out the match.

Question 3: Why was the US response so forceful?
The Petraeus briefing: Bidenís embarrassment is not the whole story

The [Pentagon] briefers [briefing Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Adm. Michael Mullen] reported that there was a growing perception among Arab leaders that the U.S. was incapable of standing up to Israel, that CENTCOM's mostly Arab constituency was losing faith in American promises, that Israeli intransigence on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was jeopardizing U.S. standing in the region, and that Mitchell himself was (as a senior Pentagon officer later bluntly described it) "too old, too slow ... and too late."

So it seems that just when the Pentagon was becoming increasingly unhappy with the lack of progress on the Israeli-Palestinian dispute, the Christian Zionists decided to throw another match on the smoldering Middle-Eastern fire. It's increasingly clear that some people really want war. We certainly live in dangerous times.

Posted by Mary at March 16, 2010 12:05 AM | Mideast | Technorati links |
Comments

thanks that answered pretty much all the questions I have had!

Posted by: Jill Bradlie at April 19, 2010 02:16 PM