January 30, 2004

The 'jobless recovery' continued. Again.

390,000.

That's the estimated number of US workers who will exhaust their unemployment benefits this month. And, since the Republican-controlled Congress decided late last year not to extend the Temporary Extended Unemployment Compensation (TEUC) program, 375,000 of these workers won't be able to take advantage of any extensions or supplemental unemployment payments. In other words, they better hope Walmart or McDonald's are hiring.

According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, this January is seeing the highest number of people exhausting their unemployment benefits in any month on record.

Even after adjusting for growth in the labor force, 2.5 times as many unemployed workers will exhaust their regular benefits without qualifying for additional aid in January 2004 as in the average January from 1973 through 2003.

The number of individuals exhausting their regular benefits without obtaining further assistance is likely to remain exceptionally high for some time. In the first half of 2004, nearly two million unemployed people are expected to exhaust their regular benefits without qualifying for further unemployment assistance. That would be larger than the number in any other six-month period on record even, again, with an adjustment for labor force growth.

This analysis also includes state-by-state projections of the number of jobless workers who will exhaust their regular benefits and be left with neither a paycheck nor unemployment benefits. In 28 states, the number of unemployed workers who exhaust their regular benefits during the first half of 2004 without receiving further assistance is expected to be the first, second, or third largest such number on record, once again after adjusting for growth over time in the labor force.

For many of the unemployed, the consequences of going without a paycheck or an unemployment check are likely to be harsh. A survey conducted in April 2003 found that more than half of unemployed workers had cut back on spending on food. Similarly, more than half had postponed medical or dental treatment.

And, still being unemployed., these figures strike very close to this magpie's home.

Posted by Magpie at January 30, 2004 12:46 AM | TrackBack
Comments

The way the unemployment rate is determined uses up/down of unemployment count, so if the new claims don't match the record rate of 6 months ago (meaning maintaining a record rate), then statistically, the rate goes down. It looks good!
Any rate less than the record rate can be made to look good. This has to be explained/countered to the mass media in simple sound bytes.

Posted by: rwc on February 2, 2004 02:46 AM

Very interesting article! I am glad discovering your site!

Posted by: QuitLB on February 2, 2004 03:48 AM

Excellent! "Unemployment claims down by 375,000!"

Posted by: Skinny on February 2, 2004 05:01 PM
Post a comment














Name and email address required.