January 29, 2004
Back Again
There are many things I could say about the last week, foremost that I haven't been much of a correspondent. One of these days, I have to get around to setting up for reliable mobile computing. But frankly, I'm pretty cheap, so I'm not holding my breath.
I'll make the obligatory comment about the Iowa speech. I was in the crowd near the stage, and could only just hear what was going on. My tape recorder was with me, but it wouldn't have been able to pick anything up. No matter how it came off when you cut out the sound of 3,500 other screaming people, playing any three second clip over 600 times in a week is a bit excessive.
Also, at 28, I was usually the youngest person in my cabin in Iowa. One of the gentlemen staying there had worked on the Kennedy campaign, and was delighted to see so many people getting involved in politics again. He, like Dean, seemed astonished by the fact that there was so much youthful interest. But considering the apparent typical age of political participation, that seems to mean 'under 35', instead of the media implication that it always means 'barely old enough to vote'. Interns may be about the same age in any enterprise, but I'd hazard that the average age at the bloggers' breakfast was about 45. Though that may be a lowball.
It's great when anyone wants to encourage younger voters to get involved, or really to encourage anyone to get involved. Voter turnout rates hovering at fifty percent are pathetic, and youthful apathy just downright discouraging. But I wish that all parties would quit acting as though seeing 'young' (whatever that means to you personally) political participants was the equivalent of a Yeti sighting. Maybe if it was taken for granted that everyone should do their gottd*m job as a citizen and pay attention to how the country is run, more people of every age would step up.
I met a lot of wonderful people on the trip, and had a great time, but it'll take a bit to figure out which other pictures and interviews should be shared from Iowa. Further, I find myself not wanting to talk about anything that happened after Iowa. There was much navel-gazing in the course of risking frostbite in NH, and I just don't feel like sharing any of it. Though in case you were wondering, I believe the Dean campaign could still win this thing.
Here at home, there's the WA state caucus on February 7th, school to catch up on, and a living to be made. I'll make an effort to break web silence periodically, but there's lots to do that requires separation from the Venerable Box.
Posted by natasha at January 29, 2004 03:00 AM | TrackBackNo, no Natasha, you can't be 28.
Some of the wealthier Athenians, such as Natasha, bought captives of unusual cleverness and learning--such as Mary and me--to post at their blogs when they were too busy to do so themselves. (As you can see, the secondary market in bloggers is not brisk).
This contradicts what we read in Thucydides
Posted by: James R MacLean on January 29, 2004 04:50 AMAh, to be 28 again!
Posted by: pessimist on January 29, 2004 08:26 PM"Also, at 28, I was usually the youngest person in my cabin in Iowa."
Interesting, since a big part of the emerging conventional wisdom about What Went Wrong In Iowa involves the alleged influx of Deaniacs with dyed hair, visible tattoos, and pierced noses. I find it hard to believe that a professional campaign would send canvassers out looking like that, so I've been assuming this is lazy stereotyping of Dean supporters, and not based on any actual reporting. Would this be a correct assumption?
Posted by: Charlie T. on January 30, 2004 01:53 AMI'm 26 and was in Iowa. I drove one of the campaign's airport vans on Saturday, Sunday, and Monday, meeting and talking to close to 100 or so volunteers.
There is no question that the ages of the volunteer population was much more diverse than was reported by the media. I drove groups of people of all ages, including a group of 19- and 20-year olds from Northern California as well as a group of senior citizens from DC.
Posted by: ryan on January 30, 2004 04:24 AMGlad to see you back.
I spent 3 days sending out about 80 individually personalized emails to different media to get them to re-examine their coverage of the Dean speech - on network TV alone the Rebel Yell was played over 700 times.
I don't know if it helped but finally ABC on the Nightly News showed the volunteer videos I recommended - one here - http://www.idiomstudio.com/. Diane Sawyer included testimonials from every news agency but CBS (yes, even FOX) saying that they had overplayed the story. CNN even apologized to the Dean campaign.
Dean HQ seems in a bit of disarray while regrouping but the volunteers that make up the campaign are scheduling more events.
Here in Houston I might be outside the Superbowl with the visability event.
#1 on google for liberal news
Posted by: Easter Lemming Liberal News Digest on January 30, 2004 05:23 AMThanks, ELLND! I posted a link to that video at my site. There, Dean appears entirely normal--it's obvious he's shouting to be heard over the crowd.
The attacks on Dean and his loss of front-runner status appear to be entirely sui generis; but Tom Schaller thinks Dean's having been proven right about the invasion of Iraq was a liability.
Posted by: James R MacLean on January 30, 2004 02:43 PMI do not absolutely agree with the author. It is disputable article.
Posted by: Tester on February 2, 2004 03:53 AM