December 21, 2003
War Is Peace
Ick. Emma has a post up about the drive to nominate George W. Bush for the Nobel Peace Prize.
The Nobel Foundation has so far received over 100,000 signatures. Each petition is emblazoned with a dove perched on a Tomahawk missile. While this iconography might seem to work against the President, Thomson said it is at the heart of their argument. "War in and of itself isn't a peaceful act. But it isn't all that violent, either, what with today's surgical weaponry. We felt the use of the Tomahawk emphasized the kind of peace President Bush is bringing to the Mideast."
Seems that the Nobel Committee says they are seriously considering it. I feel queasy just thinking about it.
Correction: Somedays the news is just too good to be true. It turns out that Emma did a great job on her most recent Friday Satire post and totally landed me, hook, line and sinker. Hope I didn't take too many others down fantasy lane with me....
Posted by Mary at December 21, 2003 03:11 AM | TrackBackOf course, the Nobel Committee considers all nominees but it's not like the Academy Awards. And whilst you may disapprove of some of their choices, they'll never give the award to the instigator of a war. They've tried awarding political agents who where belligerents, and therefore the only plausible principles in a peace process--logic appears to be that, hateful as Kissinger was to opponents of the Vietnam War, the politcal system had put him at its apex, and therefore he alone was capable of (a) gaining control of the machinery of state and (b) defeating the hawks therein.
Theodore Roosevelt, instigator of the Spanish American War, won the NPP in 1905 for negotiating the Treaty of Portsmouth that ended the Russo-Japanese War (orders of magnitude larger and deadlier than the former). Sean MacBride, co-instigator of the Irish Civil War (1921-1922), won the NPP for co-founding Amnesty Int'l and work on the European Convention for Human Rights (NPP, 1974; Lenin Prize of USSR, 1977); Arafat shared the '94 prize with Shimon Peres and Ritzak Rabin (an explosively controversial decision on all sides, but everyone agrees that they were belligerants in a war begun long before any of them were born); ditto, Menachim Begin and Anwar as-Sadat (1978). IMO the absolute least worthy candidate of all time was not Kissinger, but T. Woodrow Wilson, a flaming flaming flaming racist who implemented Jim Crow in the federal government and went MUCH further than any other American leader to liquidate civil liberties.
But, even WW did not instigate the war he was credited with ending.
Posted by: James R MacLean on December 21, 2003 06:22 AMwe think it might be far more appropriate to nominate dubya for the *IgNobel* peace prize (see
oops. the url for the IgNobels didn't work. let's try again:
http://www.improb.com/ig/ig-top.html
Posted by: Magpie on December 21, 2003 12:25 PMEmma has a feature at Notes on the Atrocities called Satire Friday. You might want to check what date this was posted.
Posted by: Al-Muhajabah on December 22, 2003 12:18 AMThanks, Al-Muhajabah. I had wondered why I hadn't heard about this story earlier.
Posted by: Mary on December 22, 2003 01:20 AMI don't think we need worry about this. The Norwegians may kill whales, making them an unusual choice to award the peace prize, but they're not crazy (except for that Kissinger thing!).
Posted by: yankinlondon on December 22, 2003 05:24 AMWhy not give the Swedes a good laugh?
Posted by: meg on December 22, 2003 09:18 PM