November 03, 2003
Monday Reading
Melanie at dKos has a great post up on the moderate religious vote, a segment of the public that is up for grabs in the next election. She follows up with a post today on a security agenda for Democrats, with some good excerpts from a recent Clinton speech.
In the Guardian, Tariq Ali discusses the colonial occupation of Iraq, which seems to be operating in fast forward. He also resurrects one of the funniest quotes of the war to date: "...Paul Wolfowitz on one of his many visits informing a press conference in Baghdad that the "main problem was that there were too many foreigners in Iraq". ..."
Body and Soul takes issue with the idea that we need to re-evaluate 40-hr work weeks and child labor, as well as the Democratic candidates attacking Dean for appealing to Southern voters. On this last point, I've been meaning to write something about it for a while, but she beat me to it. The only thing I'd add is that, as has ever been the case, we can't elect a new people. Because we're stuck with the people that we have, it isn't any more sensible for Democrats to treat Southern voters as people to be safely ignored than it is for Republicans to treat liberal city-dwellers as people to be safely ignored. We're going to sink or swim together, so we'd better start talking. Dammit.
Nathan Newman on Bush's booming debt, and the way Monsanto is suing farmers over patented lifeforms.
Over at Wampum, Dwight Meredith considers whether it could possibly be the case that Democrats oppose Bush judicial nominees for reasons other than racism.
Al-Muhajabah comments on a book about African Muslims taken into slavery in the US.
The Talent Show on the prescience of the governor CA is losing, and Bush vs. Bush on AIDS.
Links That Have Aged (Gracefully, Mind) On The Desktop Long Enough: Women of the Sahara enjoy their rights and status in society. The Bush administration has decided that we don't need to monitor farm dioxins, announced, as always, on a Friday. How To Save The World on the Iraqi drug epidemic. Cold Fury explains under what circumstances Ann Coulter favors letting murderers go free.
Posted by natasha at November 3, 2003 09:07 PM | TrackBackRe: Dean's Confederate flag comments, I agree that he's trying to convey the right message, but I don't think he's chosen the best words to convey it in and I think he would do better to rephrase himself. For instance "Nascar Dads" conveys the same meaning without running the risk of offending African-Americans. I think most of the people whom I have seen taking issue with it are of the same view. We do not think Dean is racist or appealing to racists, but that his words carry unfortunate connotations to some people and could be better chosen.
Posted by: Al-Muhajabah on November 3, 2003 10:48 PMI agree with you. And it is a very unfortunate connotation. But I'm also sympathetic to thinking that there's a segment of the American public that doesn't vote for Democrats because they've been sold a bill of goods that basically says that people of color are taking what's theirs.
Those people need to be spoken to directly, not through appealing to racism of course, but perhaps through an iconic symbol that they've come rightly or wrongly to identify with. What you and I (and I believe, correctly) perceive as racial sensitivity, some people perceive as elitism.
The most important message to convey, imo, to the voting public, is a sense of a need for a shared prosperity. When this becomes a legitimate portion of mainstream public discourse, the 'need' some people have to maintain racist divisions will fade away. Because it's all about the terror of resource scarcity and competition. It's a tool whereby we're set on each other to compete for scraps, while ignoring the sumbitches who've got the whole roast to themselves.
We can't just appeal to the people who've already figured this out.
Posted by: natasha on November 4, 2003 01:56 AM