October 23, 2003
Weblogs -- what is their value?
As a fairly early adopter of the weblog technology, I've wondered what their long term value would be. Blogs such as Daily Kos are truly communities where people gather together. And Billmon's Whiskey Bar certainly feels like it has replaced Cheers as the local hangout. Dean's Blog for American provides a base for organizing and rallying online. But what is the value statement for blogs overall?
Jay Rosen answers this question by defining 10 Radical things about weblogs and their relationship with journalism. (via Scott Rosenberg)
Blogs are not journalism, and most bloggers are not wannabe journalists. Rather, in my experience many bloggers are interested in sharing their perspective on the current political scene. And I know in my case, some of the value of blogging I see is in pulling together the various strands of a story from a number of sources to put some context on it and then sharing it. I do see that one of the best things about blogs is that it provides a way to promote conversation among people with varying views. It allows us to hone our thoughts and arguments and to find ways to express inchoate thoughts.
In my opinion, blogs are the promise of the internet come real. Just as open source software provides an operating system that is built by any number of people, blogs can also be considered open source reporting. The interactive nature of a good weblog provides a real forum for give and take. As Jay said, the blogs are information seeking democracy. This seems right to me. How does this fit your experience?
Posted by Mary at October 23, 2003 04:07 AM | TrackBackThanks for the link and the thoughts. Since I've been blogging, I've ruminated on the nature of blogs as well. They're something more than just news blowback, something less than journalism. Add parts community dialogue and activism, and I think that the blogosphere--as a whole--is emerging as a distinct medium.
Ain't it cool to be a part of it?
Posted by: Emma on October 23, 2003 12:34 PMI've enjoyed my visit to your Blog.
I started a Blog simply as an experimental replacement for e-mail as my mode-of-choice for venting my spleen (I was prompted by some of the folks on my personal e-mail distribution list, when I discovered they were from the political dark-side). Initially, I really didn't care if anyone visited or read. I just wanted to keep typing the stuff I had been typing coz it made me feel better to do so. Now 3 month in, I believe that this bloggin', to clear the noggin' has legs ... and feet, and other parts too. My gut instinct is that Blogs are actually having some impact upon the current momentum of things political. Then, again, maybe I've just been sitting at this keyboard WAY TOO long now, lol!--D.A. http://bloggerradio.typepad.com/politics04/
Well, I was cruising the blogs the Thursday night before the California recall election, and saw the ABC story about Arnold's Nazi past light up the blogosphere. I was certain his political career was over - after all, look what happened to Pat Robertson's presidential campaign. But, in talking to people after the vote, I found that most Californians hadn't heard about the story. They had heard about Arnold's sexual abuse of women, and they still voted for him.
I made a point of forwarding some blog material about Arnold's Nazi past to a child of a Holocaust survivor. She STILL voted for Arnold. The only consolation is that Arnold would not have survived a Republican primary in California, because he is too liberal, even though he is a Nazi (albeit not anti-Semitic, just a brute, especially around women).
I'm afraid Jay Leno has more impact upon the public than the blogs do. Maybe when everyone has broadband internet access and they discover that US television really is BORING will this change. Until then, I don't have much hope in blogs affecting democracy. Sorry.
On my own blog, I devote a paragraph and some links indicating that voter participation reversed its trend and started declining in the US once televisions had saturated US households. The UK and Canada do not show this same effect, and I suspect it is because US television is "commercial" television, and the message of commercial television is "buy our stuff to be happy" rather than "complain to your government if you are unhappy." And I think that goes a long way to explaining life in these United States.
The blogs will never approach the importance of most (other) media, mainly because of the "preaching to the choir" effect. Because it's reading, instead of radio/TV, it takes effort and time.
I do believe blogs played a big part in bringing down Lott, and I hope blogs keep the yellowcakeMateGate alive!
As a total layman outsider who surfs 2 hours a day, I want to blog. But what would I have? I have no sources; I would be a distillation of the current situation, heavily flavored "my way." Now, ... I happen to think that has merit, but then, I can surf'N'comment. But then, I want a record, not just a bunch of WORD files. I think the singular action of maintaining a fairly current blog is admirable enough - a wonder if content has universal - you know - beyond the emitter's value - if it reached out and got someone. That alone is enough.
Interesting...
Posted by: Robin on December 26, 2003 07:07 AMHey guy! Just respect to you for what you are doing! And for you know exactly the idea what u r talking about! It's very informative and splendid page! A lot of intresting stuff could be found here. Anyhow I wish you luck and all the best in your life and work!
Posted by: Columbo on December 29, 2003 06:11 AM