October 08, 2003
Thoughts on California's Democracy
I've been listening to the reports this evening and wondering what does Arnie's election mean for our democracy. In most of the reports I heard, there was very little about the fact the Arnie received HUGE amounts of free air time, and that he was able to conduct his campaign in an enormous bubble. Arnie has not had any real scrutiny until this last weekend. And I suspect he will get a free pass for a long time. So who will hold him accountable, Larry King?
There is a LOT of anger in the country today. It was Davis who reaped that anger today. But I do believe (and hope) that the same anger will be directed at the White House next year for their mis-management of our country because I do not believe there is anything that the Bushies will do that can fix their mistakes on this front. The anger against the world the Bushies created will continue to grow.
They say that this is Democracy. But the American forefathers didn't want to see people going to the polls without understanding the issues. Yet, I don't see any sign that people have understood the issues (unless you say the issue was get rid of Davis). They are throwing out Davis because of their anger and installing Arnie because he is a star. But how does this play next year? Here are some of the quotes from the local PBS news tonight. Quote: "Voters are pretty smart, and they do pay attention. With more turnout this [result] is good." And: "Frankly, I think the voters like this control..." Were they smart or is it a matter of "cut of your nose to spite your face"? We will definitely find out soon.
California is almost ungovernable. The initiative process (direct democracy) has created a budget process that is totally stuck. It will be very hard for anyone, much less a novice, to get a budget that works and doesn't really hurt a lot of Californians. Can anyone make the government work in California? The political reporters were opining that this will make politicians more cautious. During the last 20 years, politicians have been totally stymied by the "can't make a decision without getting the people's vote". California refuses to trust professionals to make decisions -- so no decisions will be made and nothing will get done. Not exactly a harbinger of success. This will be a real problem for Arnie.
So what are Arnie's priorities and what does he support? The thing to watch is to see how much Pete Wilson affects Arnie's choices and governance. And to watch how much Arnie abets the plutocrats. Arnie says he is working for "all the people". But he is also on record to help his friends in the Energy Companies. The rubber hits the road when you see which sides he picks. Prediction: he won't be for the little guy.
Can Arnie be successful? Word is starting to spread that the Republican White House will be willing to help a state that has a Republican governor. This will be another thing to watch. Will Bush spend some of his precious money to "rescue" California? Or will he continue to slam the state because it is a blue state?
Finally, how is Arnold going to govern? This election gave him some credibilty because they say it was of LANDSLIDE proportions. What will he do with it? Will the legislature be happy to cut services to make Arnie look good? And will people be happy with the cuts? What will the people want next? And who really is in charge (Pete Wilson, Karl Rove)? Should we just give up hope on being able to govern California at all?
Update: Why does California pick "B-grade" actors for governor?
Posted by Mary at October 8, 2003 03:34 AM | TrackBackThanks for a fantastic posting, Mary. I know it must be heartbreaking to see this happen in California just as you move here. I can't say I was surprised, but I really am depressed at the infantile proclivities of the California electorate. I mean, a guy who uses his free air time to announce he will (literally, as it happens) squash the car tax--no adult has any excuse for voting for that. Even an entirely illiterate adult who has the misfortune to be innumerate as well.
The recall voters were probably dying for a "moderate" (which Schwarzenegger was portrayed as) who promised to cut taxes. It was the philosophy I always paraphrased as, "I've-got-mine-to-hell-with-you."
Posted by: James R MacLean on October 8, 2003 05:38 AMDean made an excellent statement.
Howard Dean on the California recall
http://blog.deanforamerica.com/archives/001795.html
Today's recall election in California was not about Gray Davis or Arnold Schwarzenegger. This recall was about the frustration so many people are feeling about the way things are going. All across America, George Bush's massive tax cuts for the wealthy are undermining state budgets, causing cutbacks in services and increases in local property taxes.
Were recalls held in every state, it's quite possible that 50 governors would find themselves paying the price for one president's ruinous national economic policies.
Tonight the voters in California directed their frustration with the country's direction on their incumbent governor. Come next November, that anger might be directed at a different incumbent...in the White House.
I've sort of been wandering around the Internet in a daze this morning, Mary ... just trying to sort things out in my mind. I've been a Californian for the past 22 years, and never once did I suspect that Californians could do what they did yesterday. The pain and the anger and the despair I'm feeling right now is hard to describe.
I agree with every last word you wrote. Every last word.
Yesterday I had the unfortunate experience of having my heater repaired by a political junky from hell (the worst kind ... the ill-informed). The guy couldn't shut-up. Every time I gently corrected him on something, he was off and running in another direction. Oh, he didn't believe all of those groping allegations being slung at Arnold ... that was just dirty politics on the part of the Dems. Arnold had great ideas. Arnold is what we need.
Not only that, but Iraq is going to be just fine ... because, you see, Afghanistan turned out SO well! (No, I'm not kidding. He firmly believed that.) When I pointed out a few facts about the Afghanistan situation that he didn't want to hear, I could tell by the look on his face that he thought I was a loony.
"And I am SICK of people saying that this country is at fault in any way. That's crap! America is the BEST, the most COMPASSIONATE country on the face of the earth!!"
At which point something told me that Arnold would win this election. How could he lose in the face of such ignorance?
Welcome to California, Mary.
Posted by: Pat K., California on October 8, 2003 11:39 AMThis California recall election could easily be called the "Entertainment Tonight" election, given the free press Ahnuld got on that program during the run-up to election day. Pop culture and political discourse/action have become one.
As for the B-movie actors as governor angle: maybe it's time to update Gil-Scott Heron's classic "B-Movie".
Posted by: James on October 8, 2003 09:33 PM